A woman with dark brown hair wearing a black top and a smartwatch on her wrist, sitting at a table with her hands folded. She has a slight smile and is looking at the camera. The background features wooden and light-colored furniture.

Natasha Brown

CILEx Lawyer


Natasha advises on all areas of family law including divorce, financial remedy, children law matters and Family Law Act proceedings. 

Natasha has worked exclusively in family law since 2010. She qualified as a CILEx Lawyer in 2020 after completing her studies with the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives and is a Fellow of CILEX with full authorisation to conduct litigation.

Natasha has a particular interest in complex children matters and has represented numerous clients in protracted domestic and international relocation disputes, including applications for leave to remove children from the jurisdiction.

She adopts a realistic, pragmatic and empathetic approach, recognising the challenges that family disputes can bring. Natasha is committed to ensuring that her clients feel supported, informed and reassured throughout the legal process, helping them navigate what is often a difficult and stressful time in their live

Reported Cases

— 2021

Marie-Therese Elisabeth Helene Hohenberg Bailey v Anthony John Bailey & Ors
[2022] EWFC 5

Natasha was part of the team acting for Princess Marie-Therese Hohenberg Bailey in a long-running dispute concerning the enforcement of financial orders made following divorce. Despite findings in the underlying financial remedy proceedings that the husband had been dishonest and had sought to frustrate the implementation of the court's orders, he continued to refuse to take steps required to enable the wife to receive her financial award. Following extensive enforcement proceedings, the Court found that the husband had acted in contempt of court and sentenced him to 12 months' imprisonment. Two third parties who had assisted in obstructing the implementation of the orders were also found in contempt. The decision demonstrates the Family Court's willingness to take robust action where parties deliberately ignore court orders and seek to prevent the enforcement of financial awards. It highlights the extensive powers available to the court, including committal to prison, when faced with serious and persistent non-compliance.

View Case