Lois Rogers
PArtner 
Lois is a leading family lawyer advising on all issues arising upon relationship breakdown, including divorce and dissolution, financial remedies, nuptial agreements, injunctive proceedings and children matters, but with a particular focus on complex financial cases, often involving international assets across multiple jurisdictions.
Lois is renowned for her empathetic, dedicated and strategic approach. She advises both domestic and international clients and is regularly instructed by high-net-worth individuals on complex family law matters.
Before joining Ribet Myles, Lois practised family law for over ten years at a leading boutique matrimonial law firm. Prior to that, she worked in City law and as in-house counsel at a leading financial institution. This background gives her particular insight into the corporate and financial aspects of family law disputes, including complex remuneration structures, financial disclosure, asset tracing, and the treatment of business and trust assets.
Lois has significant experience in high-value financial remedy proceedings and regularly advises on cases involving complex corporate and trust structures. She is also highly experienced in Schedule 1 proceedings, where financial claims are pursued on behalf of children.
Lois is recognised for her expertise in family law by both the Spear's 500 Index and The Legal 500, where she is ranked as a Next Generation Partner.
-
2007 Qualified – International Finance, Hogan Lovells LLP
2010 Legal Counsel - Corporate and Asset Finance, Macquarie Bank
2013 Senior Partner, Vardags
2023 Partner, Ribet Myles LLP
Lois is truly excellent. She is a great lawyer, hard worker, totally on top of the detail, with a strong sense of case strategy.
It is a joy to work with Lois as counsel. I would recommend Lois to anyone looking for an experienced and kind financial remedies solicitor.
An experienced and kind financial remedies solicitor who inspires confidence in even the most difficult circumstances.
Lois Rogers is a first-rate solicitor. She is strategic, empathetic and dedicated.
Lois Rogers combines exceptional expertise with a personable approach that immediately puts clients at ease.
Lois is an exceptional partner. Her personable manner, combined with her knowledge and experience, means she puts clients at ease while advising them in what are often difficult circumstances.
Reported Cases
CG v SG
[2023] EWHC 942
Lois acted in this significant financial remedy case involving the valuation of a successful financial advisory business and the treatment of investments acquired after separation. The Court was required to determine the value of a business heavily dependent upon the husband's personal reputation, expertise and client relationships, together with assets generated post-separation.
SC v TC
[2022] EWFC 67
Lois acted in this complex financial remedy case involving trust assets and the extent to which they should be taken into account when determining a fair financial settlement on divorce. The Court was required to consider the reality of the parties' access to trust resources and the weight to be attached to those resources when assessing needs.
CA v DR (Schedule 1 Children Act 1989: Pension Claim)
[2021] EWFC 21
Lois acted in this important Schedule 1 Children Act case concerning financial provision for the child of an unmarried couple where the father had substantial wealth. The case considered housing provision, maintenance, education costs and pension provision for the benefit of the child.
Quan v Bray
[2014] EWHC 3340 (Fam)
Lois was part of the team acting for the wife in this complex financial remedy case involving a charitable trust established to support the conservation of endangered Chinese tigers. The Court was required to determine whether the trust assets should properly be treated as a matrimonial resource available to the parties.
Chai v Peng
[2014] EWHC 750 (Fam)
Lois was part of the team acting for the wife in this high-profile international divorce case involving a dispute as to whether the parties' divorce and financial claims should proceed in England or Malaysia. The case involved substantial international assets and complex jurisdictional arguments.