Divorcing a Spouse who has the upper hand: How to Protect Your Position

By Ribet Myles Family Lawyers – Specialists in High-Value and Complex Divorce

Edited by Alistair Myles - Partner

With over 15 years of specialist family law experience, Alistair works on complex financial remedy cases often involving assets in different jurisdictions and complicated trust structures. Alistair has worked on many reported cases over recent years.

If you are going through a divorce and feel that your spouse has the upper hand, this is not an unusual position to find yourself in.

In many cases, one party may:

  • Control the finances or access to funds 

  • Seek to move matters forward quickly 

  • Appear more informed or better prepared 

  • Have already taken legal or financial advice 

  • Suggest that formal representation is unnecessary 

This can create a sense of pressure, as well as uncertainty about how best to proceed.

An imbalance at the outset does not determine the outcome.

However, how matters are approached at an early stage can have a lasting impact on the eventual position.

Where there is any uncertainty, it is sensible to pause and ensure that decisions are made with a clear understanding of their implications.

Where one party controls the finances or the pace of discussions, clarity at an early stage is particularly important.

What does “having the upper hand” in a divorce mean?”

In practice, having the “upper hand” in a divorce usually reflects a difference in control — whether over finances, information, or the pace at which decisions are made.

This is rarely attributable to a single factor. More commonly, it arises from a combination of circumstances, including:

  • Financial control — one party manages accounts, income, or investments 

  • Greater wealth or earning capacity 

  • Access to information — one party has a clearer understanding of the finances 

  • Preparation — steps have already been taken to obtain advice or organise information 

  • Pace and pressure — discussions are being driven forward quickly 

  • Complex assets — including businesses, trusts, or international interests. These issues often arise in high net worth cases

  • Personal dynamics — one party takes a more assertive or controlling approach 

In many cases, the difficulty is not a lack of options, but a lack of clarity about what those options mean in practice.


If your spouse is rushing the divorce or applying pressure to agree

Situations where one party seeks to move matters forward quickly are frequently encountered.

It is not uncommon for this to be framed in terms of simplicity or efficiency, for example:

  • “We can resolve this between ourselves” 

  • “There is no need to involve solicitors” 

  • “It is better to agree matters quickly and move on” 

A constructive approach is, of course, preferable where it is appropriate. However:

In practice, pace tends to favour the party who is more prepared.

At an early stage, there may not yet be:

  • a complete understanding of the financial position 

  • clarity as to income, assets, or liabilities 

  • a full appreciation of how different outcomes may operate in practice 

We regularly see situations where decisions are made before the full picture has emerged, and where those decisions later prove difficult to revisit.

This is often the point at which longer-term difficulties begin.

What may be presented as efficiency can, in some circumstances, operate as a form of pressure.


How legal representation can assist where there is pressure in a divorce

Where one party is driving the pace of discussions, introducing a family lawyer often changes the dynamic.

In practice, this can:

  • Create distance from direct pressure
    Communication can be handled via your lawyer in a more structured way, reducing the need for immediate responses. 

  • Provide clarity as to your position
    A clearer understanding of the financial and legal framework allows decisions to be made with greater confidence. 

  • Ensure an appropriate pace
    Matters proceed once the relevant information is available, rather than in response to external pressure. 

  • Introduce objectivity and reassurance
    Decisions can be considered in a measured way, without the immediate influence of emotion or urgency. 

  • Recognise familiar patterns
    Situations that may feel personal or unexpected are often well understood in practice, and can be addressed accordingly. 

  • Ensure that positions are properly articulated
    Allowing for a more structured and considered approach to discussions. 

In many cases, the introduction of structure and distance allows for a more balanced and considered process.

Where one party appears to be setting the agenda, this can help to restore equilibrium.

For many clients, the ability to step back from direct pressure, and to approach matters with greater clarity, is one of the most valuable aspects of having representation.Are Music Royalties Considered Matrimonial Assets?

A key question in many cases is whether royalties form part of the assets to be divided.

In general terms, royalties generated from work created during the relationship may be considered as part of the matrimonial pot, although the precise treatment will depend on the specific circumstances of the case.

This includes not only income already received, but potentially future royalty streams relating to a right created during a relationship, which can be one of the more complex aspects to assess.


Where one party controls the finances

Where one person has managed the finances during the relationship, it is common for there to be limited visibility for the other.

This may give rise to uncertainty as to:

  • what assets and accounts exist 

  • how finances are structured 

  • what income is available 

  • whether the full position has been disclosed 

In divorce proceedings in England and Wales, both parties are required to provide full and frank financial disclosure before any final settlement is reached.

There are also mechanisms within the process to ensure that both parties are able to engage on an informed basis — including in circumstances where one party does not currently have access to funds.

Concerns regarding how professional advice will be funded can often be addressed within the process itself.

In many cases, what initially appears to be a significant imbalance is reduced once the financial position is properly understood.


Do you need a solicitor for divorce?

It is not a requirement to instruct a solicitor in order to obtain a divorce.

In more straightforward cases — where the financial position is clear, limited in scope, and genuinely agreed — some parties may choose to proceed without representation.

However, where there is any form of imbalance — whether financial, practical, or in the way discussions are being conducted — this is often where support is most valuable.

It is not uncommon for individuals to reach a point where decisions have already been made, and only later does the significance of those decisions become clear.

By the time the implications are fully understood, it can be difficult to revisit what has already been agreed.

It is not unusual for agreements to be reached without a complete appreciation of their longer-term consequences.

Where one party appears to have the upper hand, the issue is often not immediately visible at the time decisions are made.

Ensuring that your position is properly understood and articulated helps to avoid decisions being made on an incomplete or uneven footing.


What determines the outcome in a divorce settlement?

A divorce settlement in England and Wales is based on fairness, taking into account needs, resources, and the overall circumstances of the case.

Outcomes are influenced by:

  • the full financial position 

  • the application of the legal framework 

  • the evidence available 

  • the approach taken to resolving matters 

In many cases, the difference is not the starting point, but the clarity and structure applied to the process.


Common mistakes where there is an imbalance

Where one party appears to have the upper hand, certain missteps are frequently encountered:

  • agreeing matters without a full understanding of the financial position 

  • relying on informal or unrecorded arrangements 

  • allowing pace or pressure to dictate decision-making 

  • proceeding on assumptions rather than verified information 

In many cases, difficulties arise not because an incorrect decision is made, but because it is made without a complete understanding of the position.


Practical considerations

Where there is any sense of imbalance, it is generally sensible to:

  • establish a clear understanding of the financial position 

  • retain relevant financial documentation where possible 

  • ensure that decisions are not made under pressure 

  • allow sufficient time for proper consideration 

  • seek clarification where there is uncertainty 

In many cases, the position is more balanced than it may initially appear once the relevant information is available.


How Ribet Myles can assist

Ribet Myles advises on complex and high-value divorce cases, including those involving financial disparity, business or trust structures, and international elements.

The focus is on:

  • establishing a clear and accurate understanding of the position 

  • ensuring that decisions are taken on an informed basis 

  • adopting a structured and considered approach from the outset 

  • protecting longer-term outcomes, including where privacy or reputation is a concern 


Frequently Asked Questions

What should I do if my spouse controls all the money in a divorce?

It is important to ensure that the full financial position is understood. The legal process requires full financial disclosure from both parties.

Can my spouse cut me off financially during divorce?

There are mechanisms within the legal framework to address financial imbalance and ensure that both parties are able to participate appropriately, without one party “strangling” the other party financially as a way to increase pressure.

Do I have to agree to a timeline set by my spouse?

No. It is generally advisable to ensure that decisions are made with a full understanding of the position, rather than in response to external pressure. It is also worth remembering that due to court timelines, it is not possible to get divorced in less than 6 months. Time and care can therefore be taken to ensure that the financial outcome is correct. 

What if my spouse refuses to disclose assets?

The legal process requires full disclosure. Where there are concerns, steps can be taken to obtain the necessary information.

Do I need a solicitor if things seem straightforward?

In some cases, matters may be relatively simple. However, where there is any uncertainty or imbalance, ensuring that the position is properly understood before decisions are made is important. There may also be potential unforeseen pitfalls that a specialist family law solicitor can help you avoid.


What to do next

If you are concerned that your spouse may have the upper hand or is putting pressure on you, the most important step is to ensure that your position is properly understood before moving forward.

It is rarely necessary to resolve everything immediately.

However, clarity at an early stage can make a significant difference to how matters unfold.

If you would like to understand where you stand before making any decisions, a conversation at this stage can make a meaningful difference.

To discuss your position in confidence, call 020 7242 6000 to speak to a member of our team.

Next
Next

Divorce for Musicians: A Definitive Guide to Royalties, Rights and Complex Financial Issues